Showing posts with label The ObserverGuardian. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The ObserverGuardian. Show all posts

Call centres: can we learn to love them?

Twenty-five years after their inception, call centres are finally getting a makeover, with awards ceremonies, consumer feedback and, above all, an emphasis on the human touch. Tom Lamont goes behind the scenes to meet the real people to whom your call is important

  • The Observer,
  • British Gas call centre
    British Gas call centre.

    His exact words, reading like sweary Enigma code, were "cock up brain dead in call centre clueless", but we all understood what Alan Sugar meant.

    Earlier this month the business tycoon had taken to Twitter to vent a fury, some problem with his BT internet connection, a faulty router, the details didn't matter – it was the call centre that did it, and Sugar expressed a universal frustration. After speaking too long to a leaden operator, being passed about departments like an insensate parcel, hearing several loops of "Greensleeves" and "Mambo No 5", who hasn't thought of smashing down the phone and screaming "cock up brain dead in call centre clueless" at the ceiling?

    Uniquely irritating, call centres are unavoidable in modern life: the gateway to household-bill or working-boiler or hard-shoulder rescue, even (from this month) an appointment with the local doctor – at least in places like Manchester and Milton Keynes where bookings at 50 general practices are to be grouped under a remote call-centre booking system.

    How much do we really know about them? "More people have worked in call centres than ever worked in the mining industry," says the writer Matt Thorne, a former operator who wrote a novel, Eight Minutes Idle, about his experiences, "yet it's an occupation that has a relatively low public profile."

    Keen to find out more about this industry that employs more than a million Britons, so often a source of anguish for the remainder, I am at the Call Centre Expo in Birmingham's NEC Arena. Thousands of insiders gather here every year to tour the hangar-like space, sharing advice and innovations, selling each other products and worrying about an industry that has gone through some juddering changes in its short lifespan.

    It is a frenetic event. Men on podiums have imaginary conversations into futuristic headsets. A consultancy firm has erected a "wall of honesty", asking visitors to confess to past sins like hazy option menus, or neglect. Later in the evening, I have seen advertised, the European Call Centre of the Year awards will be staged in a neighbouring hotel. For now, guests are invited to sit in on talks in the hall's various lecture spaces: "My Call Centre Doesn't Understand Me", "Press One To Get Lost", "Hello Mr Bond We've Been Expecting You (The True Value of Voice)", "Tenacity! Selecting The Right People To Work In A Call Centre".

    I stop in at "Press One To Get Lost", a 45-minute oration by a consultant called Don Peppers who rails at the culture of pass-the-potato phonecalls and the fact that two-thirds of UK customers think service levels have plummeted in the past three years. Peppers bemoans rudeness, inattention, ending with a stark warning to his audience of call-centre bods: "Remember that customers have memories. They have brains."

    It is a rousing address, and seems to sum up a prevailing theme at the Expo, with its wall of honesty, its self-flagellating seminars: that it's time for the industry to rediscover its humanity. Lord Sugar, after his Twitter rant, got an apology call from BT chairman Ian Livingston. Unusual circumstances, but the personal touch did the trick and Sugar's tropical fury was assuaged. Customers have brains, said Don Peppers. When did the idea ever get lost?

    Call centres as we know them – banks of agents, "press 21 if your surname contains a double consonant" – first appeared in Britain in 1985, when the businessman Peter Wood founded the telephone-based insurance company Direct Line. His 63-man centre in Croydon was followed, in 1988, by a First Direct centre in Leeds, a location chosen because of the pleasant lilt of the local workforce. By the mid-1990s this cost-reducing method of managing inbound and outbound calls was a business standard, the industry, by the mid-2000s, one of the fastest-growing in the UK.

    Somewhere in its 25-year lifespan, admits Peter Wood, now the head of esure insurance, "the phrase 'call centre' came to have all sorts of associations for people, often bad". A survey by the Citizens Advice Bureau in 2004 revealed that 97% of call-centre customers had had cause to complain. "Lack of human contact" was a major woe – actually a calculated move by industry innovators looking to slim call times (and staff costs) through automation. At the Birmingham Expo I'd listened to Nicola Millard, a call-centre wiz from BT, speak about the era of self service that everybody expected would be in place around 2008. "We were all supposed to be redundant!" Millard reminded her audience: robots were meant to be answering the phones, customers plinking in their complaints and queries via a telephone keypad.

    Number pressing, of course, came to be seen as special torture. "Like everyone, I hate push-button options," says Wood. "You don't know you've taken the wrong path until it's too late." Customers rebelled, hammering zero to speak to a real person. An entrepreneur even set up a website, gethuman.com, revealing which keys to press to bypass option menus. Self service was scaled back.

    Another cost-cutting measure, the export of call-centre jobs from the UK to Asia from 2001, further damaged the industry's image. Migration peaked around 2005, institutions like the AA and National Rail Enquiries shifting tens of millions of calls east. But callers hated it; something felt wrong about an agent in Bangalore reading out the trans-Pennine train timetable, and the whiff of bad PR grew so that companies began hauling call-centre work back to the UK. BT, said Millard, has reduced its offshore centres to three. Yorkshire-based internet company Plusnet, meanwhile, is one of many to boast in adverts of its UK-based centres – "Just down t'road", as a chummy voice puts it.

    All this flip-flopping has left the reputation of call centres in limbo, everyone with a favourite complaint. Peter Wood hates button bashing. Thorne, being on hold with terrible music playing. Peppers expresses contempt for centres that try to flog things even when being called with a complaint (it is not uncommon, apparently, for incoming calls to be routed through a sales team). For me, it's the dead voice of the operators I always seem to get – the ones that sound, at best, like they're playing Minesweeper at the other end of the line; at worst, waving two fingers at the receiver while I speak.

    Is this what it's really like? Wanting to know, I visit a call centre run by Britvic soft drinks, just down t'road from the Birmingham NEC in an industrial park off the A34. It is a small outfit, about 100 employees spread over four rooms painted a company-correct racing green. The manager, Michelle Smith, shows me around, past a wall-sized Pepsi fridge and a screen showing old Tango adverts. A storeroom has been made up to look like the counter in a pub, complete with a mural of grinning customers, so that agents can know what it's like to stare down the barrel of a faulty R Whites dispenser, and be sympathetic.

    She guides me to a desk that takes incoming customer calls. "We get all kinds," says Krista, an agent in her 20s. "People suggesting flavours. Asking, can vegetarians drink Juicy Drench? We're not medically trained – we tell them to speak to their GPs." What's the most common complaint, I ask. Money lost in vending machines, says Krista, or flat Pepsi. "Though yesterday we had a gentleman who was upset that his Pepsi had too many bubbles. We had a chat and I explained it was the nature of the product. He calmed down."

    A call comes through: a man in Eastbourne troubled by ring pulls. "I've thrown away two cans from the multipack already. When I couldn't open a third…" Krista tells him he was right to call. A bad batch, she thinks, letting him vent for 10 minutes before sending out vouchers. No script reading, no holding music – just Krista doing a good impression of somebody interested in ring pulls.

    I ask the team about the popular call centre grumbles: the number pressing, the zombie voices. There are just a lot of bad centres out there, they agree. "I hate having to ring Carphone Warehouse," says one. "Personally I'd rather throw my phone in the bin than call Vodafone," chips in a colleague. "And I'd rather slit my throat," concludes another, "than speak to BT."

    Smith leads me to the office's award shelf. There, on proud display, is a European Call Centre of the Year award, won by Britvic in 2009 for being the year's best small centre. They were chosen, thinks Smith, because of the little things: tone of voice; a deep love for Britvic products ("I like a gin and tonic, but if it isn't Britvic tonic – mine's a wine"); because they never play "Greensleeves"; because the people who answer her phones do a good job of caring, or seeming to care, about the calls they receive, however silly.

    "We were put on this earth to make relationships," says Smith. "Why should call centres be any different?"

    Having the reputation they do, the notion of a black-tie bash honouring call centres sits a little strangely. In which hotel ballroom, you want to ask, is the ceremony for 2010's loudest car alarm? But the European Call Centre Awards exist, are 15 years established, and are taken very seriously by people in the industry. This I discover while sitting among 500 of them in formal dress in the ballroom of a Midlands Hilton. Loosened by free fizz, the assembled blare like a sports crowd whenever a champion is called to the stage: a woman from Orange winning manager of the year, LV insurance victorious in the "most improved" bracket and earning a brief football chant in recognition.

    Next to me on my table are members of the Britvic team. This year they are just interested spectators, but they know what it is to climb that podium, and they whoop with particular gusto whenever a winner is announced. British Gas gets an award for large call centre of the year, and then another for best centre to work for. "So constant," says Smith, shaking her head appreciatively. "British Gas are one of the best."

    There's a strange moment when the NHS are booed, around the hall, for reasons unclear. "They help people with cancer, you dicks!" says comedian-for-hire Rufus Hound, uneasily hosting the ceremony. Hound is on a tight leash: beyond an opening tease about being unavailable to take the stage due to high demand ("but please be assured your awards are very important to me") he's kept the call-centre gags to a minimum. But as the ceremony wears on, the strain shows and Hound gives a pantomime yawn while presenting a Lifetime Achievement award. "Let's put these motherf***ers out of their misery," he says before the final winner is announced – the big one, the European call centre of the year. It is British Gas, the team climbing to the stage to collect a third trophy of the night. Smith nods her approval.

    "If you're already looking forward to the 2011 Awards," says Hound, closing proceedings, "they'll be in Mumbai." There's some uneasy laughter; most of the crowd have already started to drift away to an adjoining disco room. On the British Gas table, celebrations are under way.

    Three years ago a failing call centre, routinely listed among the worst in the country, British Gas has somehow transformed itself into the best in the game. Intrigued to know how, I arrange a visit, touring the prizewinning centre in Cardiff a week after the awards night. "Customers used to go through three minutes of recorded voice before they spoke to anybody," says John Connolly, the company's head of innovation. No longer: they now get 12 seconds before hitting an agent who's been schooled in psychometrics – taught to make judgments based on the decades old Myers-Briggs system and adapt their manner accordingly.

    Myers-Briggs dictates there are four personality types: the brisk "controller", the sensitive "feeler", the intelligent "thinker", and the joke-telling "entertainer". Customers reveal these traits, says Connolly, through their tone or their choice of words, and agents modify their conversation to fit. "If a thinker wants to chat about taking a trip to Legoland you chat about Legoland. You wouldn't ask a controller what they're doing at the weekend."

    As we move on, past a beanbag-filled space where agents are being taught to replace phrases like "no problem" with "my pleasure", Connolly tells me there used to be a room made up to look a lounge. Staff would take scripted calls, read in person by costumed actors, so they could see what it might look at the other end of the line as a customer complained about a dodgy boiler. "Callers weren't just a voice any more."

    To see how it works in practice I sit down next to an agent called Rebecca, a cheery 30-year-old. We're assaulted by calls from the moment I pull on a headset, Rebecca talking and clicking and typing without pause, multitasking like a submarine commander. In a matter of minutes she has seen through three calls: a Sutton-based "controller", ringing off happy with a debt enquiry answered; a Coventry "feeler", promised to be called back when she's had a chance to "have a nice cup of tea"; and a Cheshire "thinker-stroke-feeler", looking to take his wife's name off the bill and, after a chat about life and love, getting his wish. Over the three calls, Rebecca had been a firm-but-fair policewoman, a mate, and a marriage counsellor. I'm impressed.

    She attributes her sensitivity to an unfortunate incident, a year ago, when her own house was struck by lightning. "I had to phone everybody – repairs, insurance – and some of the call centres couldn't care less. No personal touch." British Gas sees this as key to its reinvigoration: a return to empathy. Strange to think something so essential was ever mislaid.

    I tell Rebecca I'm particularly impressed with the man who called up angry and rang off happy. "Fingers crossed he rated me well," she says, and we watch a little box on her screen that will reveal, through a post-conversation survey he's agreed to conduct, what he thought of his call to Rebecca. We stare for a while. "He might not have completed it," she says, a little despondent.

    Back in Connolly's office, I learn of some innovations the company plans to roll out: software that will recognise and bar-chart "customer agitation levels"; a bid to remove the last 12 seconds of recorded voice, wiping out any trace of self service. They've also got their eye on the World Call Centre of the Year awards, staged in Las Vegas next year. Even I shiver a little at the thought.

    "Back in 1985, we simply decided to use the phone instead of people behind counters," says the grandfather of call centres, Peter Wood. "It was pretty revolutionary, and it cut so much time and money, that's why it took off." It just went too far, thinks Matt Thorne, "the desire to maximise profit continually pushing towards a poorer service."

    Restoring the reputation of call centres, Thorne thinks – reversing Alan Sugar's "brain dead" characterisation – is up to the individuals answering the phones, British Gas's Rebecca and Britvic's Krista. "Dedicated, knowledgable employees are the only way to go. That – and maybe letting you choose your own music. Press one for dubstep, two for witch house, etc…"

    I am about to leave British Gas when somebody screams my name across the office. It is Rebecca, running over. "He filled in the survey after all," she says, breathless. Who? "The customer. The thinker-feeler from Cheshire. He liked me. Nine out of ten!"

David Cameron is walking in the air

Chris Riddell's icy blast

Chris Riddell 19 December 2010

Can Google break the computer language barrier?

Google Translate is chasing the holy grail of machine learning, but there's a long way to go before accurate translation is a reality

  • Tim Adams
  • tokyo signs tourist translate
    Enthusiasts hope software could instantly translate even from images, so a tourist such as this one in Tokyo could interpret signs via his mobile phone. Photograph: Khaled Kassem/Alamy

    Were you to run perhaps the most famous line in literature, the opening sentence of Anna Karenina, through Google Translate from Russian to English, this is what you would get: "All happy families resemble one another, each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way."

    The translation, which approximates to the best "human" version of the sentence, looks like a triumph for what used to be called artificial intelligence and now is called, less ambitiously, machine learning. The computer can understand language, we are invited to think. Run the subsequent lines of Anna Karenina through the system, though, and the picture, along with the grammar, is not quite so clear.

    "All mixed up in a house Oblonskys. Wife found out that my husband was in connection with the former in their house, a French governess, and told my husband that he could not live with him in the same house. The situation is now lasted three days and were painfully conscious of themselves and their spouses…"

    It's just about explicable, if we know the original, but barely readable. The reason for this discrepancy lies in one of the nuances of Google's system that allows interested users to improve translated texts where they can. Somebody has obviously got to the first line of Tolstoy's masterpiece and put it right. What follows is more representative of what the system is capable of.

    Ever since computers were a reality, the possibility of using their logistical power to break down barriers of language has been something of a holy grail in machine learning. The initial – unsuccessful – attempts were based on the principle that all languages could be distilled into two components: a lexicon of words with specific meanings, and a set of rules of grammar and syntax by which those words were linked together. The cold war prompted ambitious efforts by American intelligence agencies to understand the "code" of the Russian language on an industrial scale. It produced mostly gibberish.

    The first significant breakthrough in the potential of mechanised translation came in the early 1990s when IBM produced a model that abandoned any effort to have the computer "understand" what was being fed into it and instead approached the task by installing in the computer the comparative versions of as much translated text as possible and having the system compute the probability of meanings of words and phrases based on statistical precedent. The approach was pioneered by Frederick Jelinek at IBM, who, distrusting models that grew from analogies with human learning of grammar, insisted: "Whenever I fire a linguist, the performance of our system improves."

    A decade or so later, though, the statistical-based system was becoming severely limited, particularly so when it attempted translations from languages in which there was comparatively little text to "learn" as reference. It was at this point that Google entered the field in earnest. The impetus for Google's translation machine can be traced, corporate legend has it, to a particular meeting at the company's California headquarters in 2004. One of the search engine's founders, Sergey Brin, had received a fan letter from a user in South Korea. He understood that the message was in praise of the innovative scope of his company, but when Brin ran it through the machine translation service that Google had then licensed it read: "The sliced raw fish shoes it wishes. Google green onion thing!"

    Brin believed that Google ought to have the capacity and determination to improve on that particular piece of nonsense. In the years since, as its global interests have grown, the free Google Translate service has evolved to attempt instantaneous translations from 52 languages; it offers a "toolkit" for speakers of more marginal languages to establish their own services, and it is used tens of millions of times a day to translate web pages and other text.

    The great improvements Google has pioneered in that time have been based almost entirely on its unique access to vast quantities of translated text, billions of sentences, trillions of words, that can be searched for likely matches in seconds. A good deal of these data come from transcripts of United Nations meetings, which are routinely translated by humans into six languages, and those of the European Parliament, which are translated into 23.

    Google has incorporated text from its comprehensive book-scanning project and other internet sources to add still further to that syntactical database. (In this it has the edge over its chief translation rivals, Microsoft's Bing and Yahoo's Babel Fish, which are based on broadly the same principles.) As a company, it is in the habit of making great claims for the possibilities of this effort. It announced earlier this year, for example, that the translation tool was being combined with an image analysis application that would allow a person to take a mobile phone picture of a menu in Chinese and get an instant English translation. In the summer, it suggested that it would use speech recognition technology to generate captions for English-language YouTube videos, which could then be immediately dubbed into 50 other languages.

    "This technology can make the language barrier go away," Franz Och, who leads Google's machine translation team argued. "It will allow anyone to communicate with anyone else."

    That utopian promise is a seductive one. In his recent book, The Last Lingua Franca, Nicholas Ostler, chairman of the Foundation for Endangered Languages, argues that translation engines such as Google's will eventually liberate the world from the necessity of learning dominant languages, such as English, and will reinforce linguistic diversity. When I speak to Ostler he is convinced that these changes are inevitable: "The future is easy to predict, though you don't know when it will happen."

    Despite a degree of fluency in 26 languages, Ostler says he is often on the Google Translate site and believes it represents this future. "Even if you don't like what it says, you can immediately make sense of what it gives you or compare it with what you know. It still needs constructive intelligence from the user. But the fact is that it is much better than it used to be and no doubt it will continue to improve."

    One consequence of its wider acceptance, presumably, will be to make people more lazy about acquiring languages?

    "There is," Ostler says, "a sort of irony in that; though we may see a more multilingual future, as English starts to wane, you will see less multilingualism in individuals." The fastest-growing languages online, he points out in his book, are Arabic, Mandarin Chinese, Portuguese, Spanish and French, in that order. "The main story of growth in the internet," he suggests, "is of linguistic diversity, not concentration."

    Given the garbled state of much current machine translation, though, won't a shared language be as far away as ever?

    Ostler argues that "mass production always gives you lower-quality stuff than artisan craftsmanship ever did. It is the same sort of consideration with Google Translate. Even so, there is no doubt that the more data that come in, the more languages that are assimilated, the better it is going to be."

    Those who are working at the sharper end of the translation models tend to be slightly more cautionary about that future. Phil Blunsom, who lectures in machine learning and linguistics at Oxford, and has been involved in creating next-generation translation tools, suggests: "Most of the difficulties we face are what we call 'tractability'. Even in the simplest word combinations, we are searching through a massive space of possible options. For a computer to understand how a sentence works, it basically has to iterate over all possible options of a syntactic structure between different words and then work out which is the most likely. It is an exponential computational problem, particularly as sentences get longer and more complex."

    Andreas Zollmann, who has been researching in the field for many years and working at Google Translate for the last year, suggests, along with Blunsom, that the idea that more and more data can be introduced to make the system better and better is probably a false premise. "Each doubling of the amount of translated data input led to about a 0.5% improvement in the quality of the output," he suggests, but the doublings are not infinite. "We are now at this limit where there isn't that much more data in the world that we can use," he admits. "So now it is much more important again to add on different approaches and rules-based models."

    That is where the old problems start. Does Zollmann see a way in which those models can eventually learn languages as well as human beings can?

    "No researcher would expect it ever to become perfect," he says. "Pronouns, say, are very difficult in some languages where the masculine and feminine don't correspond to each other. If you ever solve machine translation perfectly, then you have something that is properly artificially intelligent. Language is not separate from who we are."

    There are those that believe, as a result, that far from liberating us from our linguistic barriers, the translation tools will in fact serve to reinforce them. Douglas Hofstadter, author of the seminal book on consciousness and machine intelligence, Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid, as well as several books on the theory and practice of translation, has been among the most trenchant critics of the hype around Google Translate. He argues that the ability to exist within language and move between languages, to understand tone and cultural resonance, and jokes and wordplay and idiom are the things that makes us most human, and most individual (one of his books was based on asking 80 people to translate the same poem and delighting in the 80 discrete versions that were produced).

    The statistical models, he says, start from the wrong place. "There is no attempt at creating understanding and therefore Google Translate is doomed to the same kind of failure for ever. Of course they get occasional good results, but essentially it is mindless. They are rendering a very low-level service that will always produce something not far above the level of nonsense. I suppose that we will all bow to the pressures to use it at some level, but it will never get the flavour of phrases."

    Hofstadter suggests that just as, perversely, we seem to like the idea of the world getting smaller, so we like to think that understanding language is somehow mechanical, another problem we can outsource to our screens. "Understanding the world is what humans are good at and what machines are no good at, at all," he says. We may well all be Google Translators soon, but we may also find that, more than ever, we are lost in translation.

3D printer kits – a great gift for the geek in your life

A US firm is selling affordable 3D printers and says we will all have these machines in our homes some day soon

  • Jemima Kiss
  • Makerbot Thingomatic and Cupcake
    MakerBot's Thing-O-Matic 'prints' in 3D by building up layers of plastic. Photograph: David Neff

    Finding the ultimate Christmas present for the discerning geek has never been easy, but a small team of professional tinkerers based in New York has come up with the ultimate geek must-have – a printer that "prints" in 3D.

    Rather than printing with ink on a page, 3D printers build up objects using layers of plastic. They have been available since 2003, but Brooklyn- based firm MakerBot, which started early in 2009, has developed a small printer that comes in kit form. Having to assemble the "robot" printer adds to the charm for true tinkerers, but this DIY approach also makes it far cheaper than it might be; until now, commercial 3D printers haven't been available for much less than £25,000.

    This year, 3D went mainstream, from big-budget movies to the latest 3D cameras, camcorders and TVs. MakerBot goes one better by offering three tangible dimensions, created with their Meccanoesque kits. The first model, the Cupcake CNC, sells for $649 and the newer Thing-O-Matic for $1,225.

    "If you have trouble putting Ikea furniture together, get a friend to help you," explains Bre Pettis, co-founder and chief executive of MakerBot. "But, for a tinkerer, making something that makes things is the holy grail."

    MakerBot "prints" in either ABS, the plastic that Lego is made from, or corn-based PLA - which smells like waffles when it is used. Hacker community website Thingiverse displays the witty creativity of "fabbers" (desktop-based fabricators and fans of 3D printing): from space invader earrings and keyrings to full-size lamps, built in sections. One Marty McGuire tells the story of going to buy a shower curtain for his new flat, but finding the store had run out of shower curtain rings. This is the kind of challenge the MakerBot owner lives for, and he enthusiastically set about measuring, designing and then printing out his own shower curtain rings.

    There's an obvious bonus: buy one MakerBot and you can probably make a good batch of Christmas presents – Pettis admits he's made bottle openers and dragons as presents. The only limitations are your imagination – plus the 12.5x12.5x12.5cm dimensions of the Thing-O-Matic and the fact that you can print in any material you want, as long as it's plastic. If you're short of ideas, you can choose from the 5,000 designs already uploaded by the MakerBot community.

    MakerBot has sold just 3,000 machines so far but is struggling to keep up with demand. A UK supplier, Robosavvy, is now selling the Thing-O-Matic for £847. As with the realised ambition of Bill Gates, who famously said he wanted to put a computer in every home in the world, all of us will eventually own a 3D printer, says Pettis. The key is to make these machines affordable.

    "We're not engineers – we're tinkerers," he says, explaining that MakerBot's background in tinkering means a preoccupation with finding parts as cheaply as possibly, so much of the DIY kit is off the shelf. "If we were engineers, this thing would cost 100 times as much. But our goal is to democratise manufacturing so anyone can have a machine that makes anything they need. We want to render consumerism useless – and that doesn't work if the machine isn't cheap."

Shrien Dewani's family denounce honeymoon murder 'smears'

Relatives of Shrien Diwani, the millionaire businessman accused of having his wife Anni killed in a fake carjacking, have hired Max Clifford to help clear his name

  • The Observer,
  • Anni and Shrien Dewani first dance video
    Anni and Shrien Dewani in a still from the video of the first dance at their wedding

    The family of a millionaire accused of plotting to murder his wife on honeymoon are launching a counter-offensive today to clear his name after what they believe is a smear campaign by the South African authorities.

    Max Clifford, the publicity agent, is orchestrating the strategy to defend the reputation of Shrien Dewani, a 30-year-old businessman from Bristol, who is accused of paying hitmen to kill his bride, Anni, in a staged carjacking near Cape Town.

    Dewani's family is releasing a video of the couple's first dance at their wedding in Mumbai last month, two weeks before Anni, who was 28 and from Sweden, was murdered. The footage shows the newlyweds embracing and smiling fondly during the song, Pehla Nasha, which means "my first true love".

    Its release follows allegations that on their honeymoon Dewani masterminded the killing of his wife in Gugulethu, a notorious South African township. Several suspects have alleged that Dewani paid hitmen. However, a close family member said there had been so many lies issued by the South African authorities since Anni's murder on 13 November that it was absurd her husband should now stand trial.

    "There have been so many untruths it's been unbearable," the relative said. "We should be mourning, yet we are having to fight these smears."

    He was speaking the day after South African police commissioner Bheki Cele – who has branded Dewani a "monkey", prompting accusations of racial undertones – expressed his belief that the state will succeed in having him extradited. The family say no official extradition request has been served and that South African authorities have shunned offers of co-operation from them.

    New details of the couple's relationship emerged yesterday, including that Dewani is carrying an Indian Barbie doll he bought Anni as a gift everywhere he goes. "Shrien clings on to this doll as one of the last memories of Anni. He used to refer to her as 'his Barbie' as she, like the doll, used to love dressing up," the relative said.

    He said the couple were deeply in love and reiterated the family's explanation for choosing South Africa as a honeymoon destination: simply that "S" and "A" were the couple's initials.

    The family are also keen to deny several allegations relating to the murder, among them claims that the crime was financially motivated because Dewani had recent cashflow difficulties.

    "There is no motive," the relative said. "There is no life policy, there is no will, there is no financial motive. The civil marriage hasn't even happened yet because the plan was to go to Sweden in March for the civil marriage, an opportunity for the friends and family to have another celebration, plus it would coincide with Anni's birthday."

    He added that the prosecution case centred on a sequence of events that meant Dewani would have had to arrange a hit with a stranger 25 minutes after landing at Cape Town. "He had made no bookings with taxi drivers before he landed. He pushed the trolleys out and approached all three drivers saying he wanted to go to the Cape Grace hotel."

    The relative cited local reporters who tried to mimic the planned hit but were told it would take two weeks to organise and they would have to pay up front.

    "It is alleged that Shrien organised this in 25 minutes on interest-free credit and also managed a discount."

    The family also question how the taxi driver had pleaded penury yet found the funds for a private lawyer. "He gave two sworn affidavits to the police saying this was a normal hijacking then later gave a different account after appointing a privately-funded lawyer to negotiate a plea bargain," said the relative.

    South African police believe Anni may have been shot accidentally as her abductors argued over whether to rape her. They say the ballistics report concluded that the angle at which a single bullet entered her neck suggested the fatal shot was not fired deliberately.

    The lack of an "execution wound" is, according to Dewani's supporters, compelling proof that there was no organised hit.

    Cape Town detectives have also investigated whether Dewani, who remains on £250,000 bail, was involved in the 2007 murder of a respected doctor, Pox Raghavjee, in King William's Town, 650 miles from Cape Town.

    At the time, police ruled out robbery as a motive because neither his car nor valuables were taken.

    However, Dewani's family say he had never met Raghavjee and that his passport proves he had never been to South Africa before.

    "Anni and Shrien knew nothing about South Africa, Gugulethu meant nothing, the township meant nothing, it's like you've never been to the UK before and someone said let's go to Brixton."

    The family deny suggestions another woman was involved and also claims that Dewani was gay. Reports last week claimed that a South African male prostitute had come forward to allege he had regularly paid Dewani for sex.

Charity for homeless tells people not to give money to beggars at Christmas

Thames Reach says seasonal generosity is spent on buying crack cocaine and heroin

  • The Observer,
  • beggar
    Begging in London: one former drug addict says: "People beg for a reason. It ain’t for food or something hot to drink." Photograph: Denis Cameron/Rex Features

    A major homeless charity is urging people not to give money to beggars this Christmas. The comments by Thames Reach, which provides support to more than 8,500 homeless people in London and surrounding counties every year, are likely to reignite the debate about the merits of giving cash to people who ostensibly live on the streets.

    The intervention echoes comments made by the previous government's "homelessness czar", Louise Casey, who sparked a furore a decade ago when she described cash handouts to the homeless as "misplaced goodwill".

    But Thames Reach is citing "overwhelming evidence that people who beg on the street do so to buy hard drugs, particularly crack cocaine and heroin". Outreach team members estimate 80% of people begging do so to support a drug habit. The research is corroborated by the results of drug tests by the police on a group of people arrested for begging in Westminster; 70% tested positive for crack cocaine or heroin.

    "Giving to people who beg is not a benign act without consequences," said Mike Nicholas, a spokesman for Thames Reach. "As an organisation that has worked with people on the street for over 30 years, we have seen many lives damaged by hard drugs and alcohol misuse. We have even lost people through overdoses in situations where a significant portion of the money they spent on drugs came from members of the public giving loose change."

    Wayne Morgan, 27, has been clean for two and a half years, after being on heroin since he was 14. Having been in care since he was four, he quickly migrated to mixing crack and heroin, a £700 a day habit. On a typical day in London's Piccadilly Circus, he could make between £300 and £400, mainly from tourists. Many others who begged with him at the time have since died of overdoses.

    "Christmas Eve 2007 I was begging at Euston station," he said. "Some guy comes along and says "Happy Christmas" and gives me £3,000 cash. He was something to do with racehorses in Ireland. I spent the cash in three days on drugs and ended up in hospital."

    Wayne hated how people looked at him when he was begging and realised "I had done nothing with my life". After checking himself into a rehabilitation clinic, he is now training to be a self-employed electrical insulator and is dismissive of people who give handouts to beggars: "People beg for a reason. It ain't for food or something hot to drink."

    Thames Reach disputes the claim, often made by beggars, that they need cash to pay for a bed for the night, pointing out the vast majority of hostels do not require payment upfront. Neither are many beggars homeless, the charity says. A study revealed that only 40% of people arrested for begging in Westminster in 2005 were homeless, with most living in hostels or bed-sits.

    Nicholas encouraged the public to engage with people begging on the street and to buy them food or a cup of tea. "Best of all, if you are concerned because you think they are sleeping rough, contact your local outreach team."

    The charity denied accusations it was demonising homeless people. "Most people sleeping rough do not beg, and most people begging do not sleep rough," Nicholas said. "Although there are many rough sleepers with serious drug problems, the majority have not. Our overriding concern is to save lives. We want to help people to get off the street and into decent accommodation where they can get care and support."

    One recent study of London's drug-using population indicated that the average age that intravenous drug users are dying in central London is now down to 31.

    Tracy Isted, 40, who used heroin every day for 16 years, except for a weekend when she was in a police cell and a three-day hiatus when she was unable to score ("I lay in my own piss and shit"), recalls how one Christmas a bus driver who regularly gave her £2 when walking past her pitch in Tottenham handed her £100. "I blew it on drugs in three hours." Another Christmas she ransacked the bins of her local KFC to find food and shoplifted a bar of chocolate because she was scared that if she agreed to enter a hostel she would be moved from the set begging pitch that funded her £60-a-day habit.

    She escaped her addiction when Mark Smith, an outreach worker, persuaded her to stop living rough and get medical help. It was a huge breakthrough for someone whose life was a cycle of begging, prostitution and addiction and who had spent almost two decades living in office cupboards, a tent on marshland and in a cardboard box under a railway bridge.

    "Mark won my trust, he didn't talk down to me," she said. "He was very patient and I used to look forward to seeing him, sharing his fags and having a burger."

    After Mark had asked her "14 or 15 times" to think about coming off the streets, Tracy relented and is now off heroin and on methadone. "This time last year I thought I would be dead. But if one person reads this and decides to stop begging and get on a methadone script, sharing my story will have been worth it."

Judge calls for 'Gods and Men' killings case to be reopened

Cover-up claims in case that inspired hit film about murder of monks in Algeria

  • The Observer,
  • (FILES) - Undated file photo shows the s
    The French Trappist monks of the Tibhirine Notre-Dame de l'Atlas monastery of Medea. Photograph: -/AFP/Getty Images

    A French judge has reopened an investigation into the murder of seven monks in Algeria whose ordeal is portrayed in the film Of Gods and Men.

    The mystery of what happened to the Cistercian monks who were snatched from the Our Lady of Atlas monastery near the village of Tibhirine in 1996 has never been solved. Although it is believed that they were shot, then beheaded, their bodies have never been found.

    Islamic extremists were blamed for the killings but information emerged that implicated the Algerian military in their deaths and suggested that France had colluded in covering up the truth. The French, Algeria's former colonial masters, have refused to release confidential papers which might shed light on the case. The government has claimed the papers are vital to state security.

    In the years after the deaths, which provoked an outpouring of anger in France, the French and Algerian authorities stuck to the line that an Islamic terrorist group was to blame.

    A French film about the case, Des Hommes et Des Dieux, won the Grand Prix at this year's Cannes film festival. It was a box-office hit in France where one and a half million people saw it in the first three weeks after its release in September. Released in Britain this month as Of Gods and Men, it depicts the events leading up to the kidnapping of the monks in March 1996. Now France's foremost anti-terrorism investigating judge is waiting for a response to his official request that three French ministries drop secrecy orders on documents relating to the case.

    Marc Trévidic, who submitted his request in October, expects to have a response by the end of the month. After declarations from President Nicolas Sarkozy that he wanted more transparency, dozens of files were handed over last year. But those close to the case say vital documents have been withheld.

    In the past 14 years numerous books, documentaries, and articles have been written on the Tibhirine monks, but none has answered the questions posed by the victims' families and friends and by the Catholic church.

    The monastery, in a remote area at the foot of the snow covered Atlas mountains, was home to nine Trappist monks who passed their days in prayer and working the land. In 1996, Algeria was five years into a civil war that was to last until 1998 and the monks incited mixed reactions from the population. To those whose medical needs they tended they were friends. But to others, including those in authority, they were a symbol of French colonial power.

    As tensions rose between the government and the Armed Islamic Group of Algeria (GIA) grew, the monks were advised to leave their sanctuary. They refused. Early on 27 March 1996, several members of the GIA forced their way into the monastery and snatched seven of the nine monks. A GIA communique reported their deaths on 21 May and their heads were found on 30 May.

    Fourteen years on, there are many theories: that the Algerian army shot the monks by accident then cut off their heads and hid their bullet-riddled bodies; that a double agent was planted with the GIA who then encouraged the kidnapping and that the monks were killed in a bungled rescue attempt.

    Patrick Baudouin, the lawyer representing the family of one of the victims, told the Observer that the hypothesis that the men were killed by their Islamic fundamentalist captors holds little water. And he blamed both countries for "not wanting to find the truth".

    "We cannot say for sure what the Algerian authorities' involvement was but we can say for sure that there has been an absolute lack of transparency from the French authorities," he said.

    He added: "I believe there are people in France, politicians and members of the intelligence services, who know much more about this affair than they have said."

Kettle tactics risk Hillsborough-style tragedy – doctor

Crush of student protesters on Westminster Bridge compared to 1980s stadium disaster

  • The Observer,
  • kettle
    Police use the kettle tactic to contain protesters on Westminster Bridge. Photograph: Jon Cartwright

    A senior doctor has warned that police risk repeating a Hillsborough-type tragedy if they continue with tactics deployed during the recent tuition fee protests.

    The anaesthetist from Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, who gave medical assistance to the protesters, said that officers forced demonstrators into such a tight "kettle" on Westminster Bridge that they were in danger of being seriously crushed or pushed into the freezing River Thames.

    The 34-year-old doctor, who set up a field hospital in Parliament Square, said that people on the bridge suffered respiratory problems, chest pains and the symptoms of severe crushing.

    "Police had us so closely packed, I couldn't move my feet or hands an inch. We were in that situation like that for hours. People in the middle were having real difficulty breathing.

    "It was the most disturbing thing I've ever seen – it must have been what Hillsborough was like. The crush was just so great. Repeatedly I tried to speak to officers, telling them that I was a doctor and that this was a serious health and safety risk," said the doctor, who did not want to be named.

    Her comments will raise fresh concerns over police tactics during the protest 10 days ago during which almost 50 police and protesters were hospitalised.

    During the Hillsborough tragedy of April 1989, Britain's worst sporting disaster, 96 Liverpool fans died when police failed to control crowds and a lethal crush developed. Hundreds more were injured after being squeezed against the steel-fenced terraces of Sheffield Wednesday's stadium, which was hosting that year's FA Cup semi-final. The inquiry into the disaster led by Lord Chief Justice Taylor established that the main cause was a failure of police crowd control.

    Student Danielle Smith, 21, from Dagenham, studying creative and professional writing at the University of East London, said she was squeezed so tightly during the kettle that the day after it felt "like I'd been in a car accident".

    "I couldn't move, and it hurt to laugh, breathe, sleep, sit down and eat. To do anything just really hurt. For days after I took as many painkillers as I could a day. I had real trouble standing in such a tight space. Again people were getting crushed. I had a shield in my face a few times. The police just hit those closest to them, they weren't really thinking about who was in the wrong or right."

    She said it was incredible that none of the hundreds of protesters sandwiched between two lines of riot police fell off the bridge: "The people around the edge, they were screaming, saying they thought they were going to fall off."

    The Aberdeen doctor added: "The sides of the bridge were only waist high and all it would have taken is one stumble and someone could have gone over the side. I'm surprised that no one died there. And if anyone had been injured, I would have struggled to respond even if I was stood next to them." She said that when several police became caught inside the kettle they were screaming to get out. "They were experiencing what we were experiencing."

    Her comments also include allegations of disproportionate police violence, pointing to the number of serious head injuries among protesters. Along with two colleagues who had volunteered to staff a field hospital, the doctor said they treated around 30 protesters.

    "It got incredibly violent. The vast majority of injuries I saw were head injuries. I was surprised how much force the police had used. Between us we probably saw thirty folk. A couple of people also had injuries to their wrists and elbows where they had raised their hands to cover themselves from baton blows."

    Witnesses say a section of the crowd were ushered from Parliament Square around 9pm onto Westminster Bridge before being kettled for around three hours until they were released.

    A Scotland Yard spokesman said kettling was used to control sections of the crowd, who had became violent, while minimising force. He said that every effort was made to keep the crowd as safe as possible.

New year shock lies in store for fans of The Archers

The Radio 4 soap's editor promises that 'Ambridge will never be the same again' after 60th anniversary edition

  • The Observer,
  • The Archers
    Felicity Finch and Tim Bentinck as Ruth and David Archer. BBC

    Fans of The Archers are braced for what is coming; others remain only dimly aware. But after the first episode of the new year, Ambridge will never be the same again.

    That is the judgment of the show's veteran editor, Vanessa Whitburn, as she prepares for a double-length 60th anniversary edition of the Radio 4 soap opera.

    The rumours of imminent apocalypse have set off a flurry of speculation, especially on the internet, where the impending radio event has been dubbed "SATTC" for short, following a BBC press statement promising that the programme will "shake Ambridge to the core". Now Whitburn has offered a few additional clues; the upheaval will involve two storylines, "one running and one new surprise".

    After 20 years at the programme's helm, Whitburn is well acquainted with controversy, but she admits that this time she is apprehensive about audience reaction. The revelatory plot development planned for the evening of Sunday 2 January was put together several months ago by a team of 10 writers, but it is Whitburn who will carry the can. "The buck stops with me when it comes to storylines," she said this weekend. "If there is an impasse, then I decide."

    Should the episode go down badly, five million fans will be calling Whitburn to account. "We have said it will rock Ambridge to the core, and it is true it is going to be very exciting and very dramatic," she told the Observer, explaining she has imposed a strict anti-leak policy on the Archers team, each member of which understands the need for secrecy. "They are very good about things like this," she said.

    A favourite fan theory is that the two rival brothers Ed and Will Grundy, the Cain and Abel of Ambridge, will be involved in a violent showdown that could draw others in. Others have suggested that Lilian Bellamy's dormant feelings for Matt Crawford's brother, Paul, may be reignited. Lots of devotees are fearful about the safety of the bereaved landlady, Jolene Perks, while others are concerned about pregnant Helen and her baby. One of Whitburn's favourite storylines from the past saw Susan Carter jailed over Christmas in 1994 for attempting to pervert the course of justice. "It led to uproar about the idea of the mother of young children being imprisoned for this sort of crime. That was a story that went on from the confines of Ambridge to spark a debate about real things," said Whitburn. She received the most flak from fans, however, when she presided over the brief affair between Ruth Archer and her herdsman, Sam Batton.

    "All hell broke loose around me," she recalled. "A lot of people were angry and said Ruth would never do that. But that was the point, I said. She was tempted, but she didn't do it."

    Archers message boards have recently been jammed with political comment about teenager Pip Archer's further education dilemma and about whether the Pargetter twins should go to a state school. "We write the storylines three months in advance, so we didn't realise this was going to be quite as big a subject as it has proved," said Whitburn. Plot decisions are taken with reference to the drama's extensive historical database so that characterisations do not veer wildly and significant dates are marked.

    "People I meet do give me good story ideas sometimes that I take to the writers. But if I want to relax at a party then I don't mention my job," Whitburn said. Change, she believes, should be embraced. "We don't jettison characters at the rate of some TV soaps, but the day our show becomes all nostalgia it should end," she explained.

    Whitburn does not watch television soaps because she "can join the dots too clearly". "It is like a busman's holiday," she said, although she confessed to curiosity about the recent dramatic crash in the anniversary episode of Coronation Street. She would not say whether a similar accident is involved in the upcoming Archers spectacular. Perhaps there is a clue in what she has already said, though. As one desperate wordplay fan suggests on an Archers message board: "If you take 'Ambridge Core Shaker' you can derive: Deb Remarriage Shock."

    A special half-hour episode to celebrate The Archers' 60th anniversary will be broadcast on Sunday 2 January at 7pm.