Sunday, 27 February 2011

Army apologizes for 'unintentional confrontations' with Friday protesters


Sat, 26/02/2011 - 12:29

On its official Facebook page, the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces issued an apology to the 25 January youth for what it described as "unintentional friction" between military police members and youth protesting on Friday.

The council affirmed it is keen on achieving the noble goals of the revolution, adding that no orders were or will be given to attack Egyptians. All necessary procedures will be adopted to avoid the repetition of such clashes, the message said, without giving further details.

In a second statement, the army said it would "immediately release all the youth of the January 25 revolution that were detained in Tahrir Square (on Friday)", but did not say how many there were.

In response to the use of force to disperse Friday's protests calling for the removal of Prime Minister Ahmed Shafiq's government, hundreds of Facebook activists called for a protest today in Tahrir against using force on peaceful protesters.

The activists published videos which they said show military police using whips and tasers to break up the protest.

On Friday, thousands of Egyptians rallied in the square to celebrate the success of the revolution and call for a new government purged of old guard remnants. Even after a government reshuffle on Wednesday, a number of key ministries, including foreign affairs and defence, are still in the hands of Mubarak regime veterans.

Bahrain protests: Unravelling the sectarian politics


Sat, 26/02/2011 - 15:38
Photographed by Mohamed Elmeshad

Manama--Bahrain’s protests are causing an integral shift in its political landscape, as happened in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia.

Its shift, however, is built along sectarian lines. The two groups that emerged during the protests that erupted on 14 February are divided by a thin line.

While addressing generic human and civil rights, Bahrain’s protests brought attention to the gigantic elephant in the room, the sectarian divide between Sunni and Shia in the country.

“Sectarianism is a subject we were not able to talk about before, but are now forced to,” said Shura Council member and journalist Samira Rajab.

The Shura Council is the consultative council whose members are appointed by the Sunni king and it is the upper house of the National Assembly, Bahrain’s legislative body. The opposition say that the 2001 National Action Charter made it purely consultative, leaving legislation to the elected People’s Assembly. But in 2002, they say, the government changed the constitution, giving the Shura Council the legislative power to counter the vote of the elected MPs.

Oppositional Shia groups such as Wifaq and Haq--on the ground for a long time--created the National Coalition to bring protesters' demands to the government. They have been joined by the liberal opposition group Wa’d and the Democratic progressive Tribune who have their roots in 1970s liberal activism.

“Our main demand is the creation of a constitutional monarchy,” said Khalil Marzouk, a former Wifaq MP who resigned from parliament due to its "ineffectiveness."

The National Coalition refuses to accept the king’s invitation to an open dialogue. “If we start talking without parameters, then it’s pointless. We were involved in proposed changes in 1973, and then in 2001. How can we go in without guarantees after those experiences?” Marzouk said.

The 1973 constitution that followed Bahrain’s 1971 independence or “end of special relations with Great Britain” is considered by many Bahrainis--especially the opposition--as having offered the greatest degree of personal and political freedom of all initiatives since independence. According to academic AbdelHady Khalaf, the 1973 parliament represented all the political trends in the country at the time, but it only lasted two years. A failure to pass the State Security Decree in 1974, which was meant to safeguard against a communist uprising, led the emir of Bahrain to abrogate the main feature of the constitution, thus doing away with the entire process of building a modern political state.

The National Action Charter was ratified in 2001 after a referendum. Although Bahrainis overwhelmingly voted for changes that were meant to create a constitutional monarchy, with the elected parliament the only law-making body, the 2002 amendments gave the Shura Council an equal vote, neutralizing opposition voices in the government.

According to Marzouk, the National Coalition's political demands are truly national. He says that the demography at Pearl roundabout--where protesters have congregated since 14 February--includes more Shias because they make up the majority of the population and are subjected to a greater extent to the iniquities of the current regime. But Wa’d’s inclusion in the coalition means that it is not exclusively Shia.

For years Sunnis were considered to be protected by the king, but on Monday, in an unprecedented display, many independent Sunni groups called for a large-scale rally for “national unity” at Manama's Fateh mosque.

Official estimates say 300,000 people attended, while organizers put the figure at around 150,000.

“For 30 years, everyone just assumed that we were under the cloak of the ruling family. It’s for everyone to know that we have demands also,” said Issa Sarrayya, a member of the leadership committee of the National Unity Bloc, which officially formed on Sunday to try to consolidate the demands of and generally represent Sunni groups.

Leading members admit it formed in reaction to the organized Shia opposition, especially at Pearl roundabout. “And you may hate something when it can benefit you,” said Sarrayya, quoting the Quran. “It ended up being the reason we finally got together to organize ourselves.”

“The Shia presence has an organized social entity, now we have one as well,” said Abdullatif Almahmoud, a leading member.

The National Unity bloc includes Sunnis from all walks of life: Muslim Brotherhood factions, Salafis, liberals and independent intellectuals are represented.

At a townhall meeting on Thursday many expressed concern about the current situation in Bahrain, and their hope for what the nascent National Unity bloc can do for them.

Many wondered if the government is playing a role in it, as members of Wifaq claim.

When it comes to inciting sectarian conflict, each side points its finger at the other. “The authorities found themselves in a tight situation when the military withdrew (from their positions in front of the protesters on the square). They created another group (the National Unity Bloc) and spread rumors of sectarian strife to convince everyone that the revolution did it,” Marzouk said.

According to AlMahmoud there is distrust between certain Sunni groups and “the other party,” because of Sunni preconception that Shias are loyal to their Imam before their country. “This is why the government restricts their participation the military,” he said.

Marzouk says this cannot be true because Shia groups have been active in Bahraini politics almost every time the chance presented itself since the island voted for Al-Khalifa as ruler in 1971. “If we wanted to be a part of Iran or were allied to them we wouldn’t have agreed to the rule in 1971, and we wouldn’t have participated in the referendum for the National Action Charter in 2001,” he said.

The long-term danger of enduring sectarianism is something everyone can agree on. Rajab, of the Shura Council, believes that no matter how legitimate some of the protesters' demands are, sectarian tension is currently the most dangerous factor. “This is something that can execute our society,” she said.

Geopolitics plays a critical role in exacerbating the country’s sectarian divide. A small island in the Arabian Gulf--also know as the Persian Gulf, a geopolitical factor in itself--Bahrain lies between the two most extreme hubs of the Muslim world, Shia Iran and Sunni Saudi Arabia.

The ruling Al-Khalifa family migrated to Bahrain from the Arabian Peninsula at the end of the 18th century to eventually rule the mostly Shia indigenous population of merchants and pearl divers. The two centuries that followed saw a floods of migration from both Arabia and Iran.

Through a series of alliances foreign--mostly British, local and regional, the Al-Khalifa family was able to consolidate a series of tribal alliances to undisputed rule when oil was discovered on the island in the early 1920s.

One of the main complaints of the Shia opposition today is the widespread practice of naturalizing Sunni migrants coming to work in the country, which they say is meant to tip the scales demographically in favor of Sunnis.

Many see the continual stalling of key democratic constitutional changes as the result of the ruling party's fear on that the Shia majority will pledge an allegiance to Iran. Worse, many influential sources in the government, who spoke anonymously, confessed to a fear that Iran is behind Bahrain’s uprising.

On the other hand, Saudi Arabia’s pledge on 20 February to help Bahrain “with all its capabilities” reinvigorated Shiite fears that the there is a conspiracy to keep them marginalized.

The exiled opposition leader Hassan Mushaima, due to arrive to Bahrain two days ago but reportedly held up in Lebanon, added fuel to the flames by saying “if Saudi enters Bahrain militarily then Iran and others maybe willing to come to the help of the Bahraini people.”

Mushaima is the general secretary of Haq, one of the most prominent hardline Shia opposition groups in Bahrain. He has been arrested several times in the past 20 years, most recently charged with inciting hatred for the regime and attempting to overthrow it in 2009. The Bahraini government pardoned him along with all released political prisoners, and promised not to apprehend him upon his arrival.

Apart from Bahrain's location in the middle of the Saudi-Iran axis, it is also home to the US’s fifth fleet. US Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mike Mullen visited Bahrain on 23 February to reaffirm the US-Bahraini relationship as protests entered the 12th day.

Considering the criticism the US received for not supporting Egypt's democratic movement against now ousted president Hosni Mubarak--another major US ally in the region--it is unclear how it will play its cards.

Some think the US will act as guarantors of the Bahraini monarchy, others that they will sit back and assess the situation as it unfolds. “The US most importantly wants stability in the region to guarantee its presence here,” Rajab said.

Events in this island of no more than 1 million people have implications well beyond its size, and no one seems sure how they will ultimately unfold. However, many here believe that the longer the situation drags on, the more certainly it will have to face many of these implications head-on.

Commission announces proposed changes to Egyptian Constitution


Sat, 26/02/2011 - 18:10

An army-appointed legal commission announced Saturday a package of proposed constitutional amendments that eased restrictions on eligibility conditions for presidential elections, limited the number of presidential terms to two four-year periods and ensured full judicial monitoring of elections.

To satisfy political forces calling for the promulgation of a new constitution, the commission made it compulsory for the next parliament to draft one.

After nearly ten days of deliberation, the eight-member commission unveiled modifications introduced to eight constitutional articles that should ensure fair and free presidential and parliamentary elections.

Two articles dealt specifically with the presidential poll. With nationalist motives, article 75 was modified to guarantee that Egypt’s next president is born to two Egyptians parents and cannot marry a non-Egyptian. The old version did not include any conditions pertaining to the president’s wife.

Meanwhile, article 76 was modified to ease draconian restrictions on presidential nominations. The commission set three methods for candidacy: a presidential hopeful should either be endorsed by 30 members from one of the parliament’s two chambers or both, garner 30,000 signatures from Egyptians living in 15 provinces or belong to a party that has at least one seat in the People’s Assembly or the Shura Council.

These modifications could be seen as a significant leap from the restrictions of the old constitution. Mubarak’s regime had set defeating conditions requiring a candidate to either secure at least 250 signatures from the parliament and municipal councils or belong to a five-year-old party holding at least 3 percent of contested parliamentary seats. As an exception to this provision parties who hold one parliamentary seat could field a candidate until 2017.

Given the concentration of power in the hands of Mubarak’s formerly ruling National Democratic Party, these conditions were not seen as conducive to genuine multi-party presidential elections.

“I am very satisfied, it is a historic achievement,” Sobhi Saleh, a lawyer and commission member, told Al-Masry Al-Youm.

Last week representatives from the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces, which is in charge of running the country during the interim period, said in a televised interview that the commission’s suggested amendments would be subject to a public debate before being finalized.

In the meantime, the commission proposed an end to Egypt's legacy of eternal rulers. By amending article 77 to limit presidential terms, the commission did away with a constitutional order that gave the president the right to run for indefinite consecutive 6-year terms.

The proposed changes mean article 139 would make it obligatory for the next president to appoint a deputy within the first two months of coming to power. If the deputy is sacked, a substitute must be appointed. For thirty years, Mubarak resisted appointing a deputy, which enraged the opposition.

“He used to run the country while lying in hospitals inside and outside Egypt; he had no deputy. Could that be acceptable?” asked Atef El-Banna, professor of constitutional law at Cairo University and also on the commission. “He did not want to appoint a vice president and many people saw that as a sign ensuring hereditary succession.”

To guarantee the integrity of upcoming polls, the commission modified article 88 making full judicial oversight necessary from start to finish.

“The changes ensure complete judicial monitoring, from voter lists to the announcement of results,” said Saleh, adding that the commission also suggested changes that would allow voters to use national identity cards rather than voting cards. For decades, the opposition has complained that voting cards facilitate the falsification of polls.

Before 2007, the constitution guaranteed full judicial oversight. But in a move widely dismissed as an attempt to make electoral fraud easy, the Mubarak regime changed article 88 to delegate electoral oversight to a government-appointed judicial commission.

The commission also appeased those who demanded the abrogation rather than the amendment of the existing constitution. Article 189 on mechanisms to amend the constitution was modified to ensure that the next elected parliament use a 100-member elected commission to draft a new constitution within the first six months after its election. The commission, furthermore, will be expected to complete its mission within another six months.

“We added this amendment in order to be able to change flaws that we could not fix this time,” said Saleh.

The army is reluctant to abolish the constitution during the six-month transitional period and asked the commission to modify only provisions dealing with the nitty-gritty details of elections.

Some opposition members expected more changes to limit the president's sweeping powers. But commission members believe they achieved this to some extent.

“We limited some of the president’s authority over critical matters including the right to declare a state of emergency,” said El-Banna.

El-Banna and his peers proposed changes to article 148m which deals with this matter. The modified article makes the declaration of a state of emergency contingent upon the approval of the People’s Assembly. If the president decides to apply Emergency Law for longer than six months, a public referendum will be held. The old version, failed to set a time limit, which gave Mubarak leeway to renew Emergency Law for 30 years. This allowed his regime to perpetrate notorious human rights abuses.

By the same token, the commission proposed the abrogation of the unpopular article 179, which granted the government the right to infringe upon human and personal rights under the pretext of combating terror.

Moreover, the commission changed article 93, which granted the People’s Assembly the exclusive right to decide upon the validity of parliamentary membership and ignore court verdicts that deemed thousands of memberships nil in the past. The new version makes the Supreme Constitutional Court the ultimate arbitrator on contested memberships.

“We are putting them [amendments] to public debate now,” Saleh said. “If there is a substantive challenge, we will take it into consideration.”

A national referendum on the final changes is expected to be held within a few weeks.

outh announce protest in response to army violence in Tahrir

Sat, 26/02/2011 - 21:03
Photographed by Heba Afify

After the army violently broke up a protest in Tahrir Square and another in front of the People’s Assembly building late Friday night, thousands of protesters returned to Tahrir on Saturday insisting on a change of government and condemning the army’s violence.

The army's use of excessive force shocked protesters, who have been chanting “The army and the people are one hand” for most of the last month. The incident has severely damaged the trust that had prevailed between the army and the people.

The 6th of April movement called for a sit-in in the square starting Saturday as a reaction to the violence, while other activists announced a protest starting Tuesday.

Khalid, along with dozens of protesters, pitched his tent this morning in the square after the army allegedly damaged it last night, vowing to stay until the remaining demands of the revolution are met. “We have a goal and nothing will stop us from reaching it.”

Khalid, who was in the square last night, said the army attacked protesters shortly after midnight, destroying tents and the memorial for the revolution’s martyrs. He adds that soldiers with covered faces attacked protesters with tasers and batons, hitting and insulting male and female protesters alike.

“What we saw was the epitome of humiliation, to be sitting there feeling safe knowing that the army is protecting us only to find them attacking us,” said Khalid. “We were not surprised when the Ministry of Interior treated us that way but we didn’t expect it from the army.”

Mona, a petite teenager who was also there last night, says an army officer electrocuted her with a taser, causing her to faint. She said that after she regained consciousness, army officers proceeded to hit her with batons and step on her while calling her names.

Salma Saeed, an activist who was also present, said that, after destroying their tents, a high-ranking army officer threatened the protesters that if they broke the curfew the next day, live ammunition will be used against them.

According to protesters who were in front of the people’s assembly building, the army forced them to go into Qasr al-Eini street before midnight where they were surrounded by a cordon. The army blocked the street to keep protesters from Tahrir Square from joining them.

Jihan Ibrahim, an activist who was trapped by the army in Qasr al-Eini street, said that minutes after an army officer asked the protesters to leave, the army started chasing them down the street, electrocuting and arresting people as they fled.

“I’ve been beaten by police in protests before, but to be attacked by the army was very scary,” says Ibrahim.

Since the army took charge after the resignation of former President Hosni Mubarak, it has enforced a curfew from midnight to 6 AM. Protesters, however, complain that breaking the curfew doesn’t justify the use of excessive force against them by the army. “If I’m breaking the curfew, then they should take me home. Why would they hit me?” asked Ibrahim.

The Supreme Council of the Armed Forces issued an apology on its official Facebook page today, saying it did not issue orders to attack protesters, calling the incident “unintentional” and promising to take all measures necessary to make sure it is not repeated.

Saeed said protesters are not satisfied by this and demand a formal apology on television. Saeed adds that protesters will test the sincerity of the promise by continuing to protest in the square.

“Instead of protecting the people, the army is protecting the remains of the old regime,” said Saeed, echoing people’s concerns regarding the army’s loyalty--which have been intensified by last night's incident.

Live Blog - Libya Feb 27

By Al Jazeera Staff in on February 26th, 2011.
Show oldest updates on top

As the uprising in Libya enters its twelfth day, we keep you updated on the developing situation from our headquarters in Doha, Qatar.

Blog: Feb17 - Feb18 - Feb19 - Feb20 - Feb21 - Feb22 - Feb23 - Feb24 - Feb25 - Feb26


AJE Live Stream
- Special Coverage: Libya Uprising - Twitter Audio: Voices from Libya

Benghazi Protest Radio (Arabic)

(All times are local in Libya GMT+2)

  • Timestamp:
    4:48am

    Libyan poet Prof Khaled Mattawa of the University of Michigan tells Al Jazeera that Libya's "cultural revolution" represents the end of tolerance to Colonel Gaddafi.

    "It's game over after a long, patient struggle," he says. "This is a great cleansing coming over the Libyan people"

  • Timestamp:
    4:24am

    Libyan ambassador Ibrahim Dabasshi says the diplomatic mission at the UN is not taking orders from Tripoli.

    "I am not brave," he says. "The brave are those who face the bullets in the streets of Libya. I am just hoping to make the international community aware of what is happening."

  • Timestamp:
    4:21am

    Graffiti spotted by our correspondent in Benghazi:

    File 10831

  • Timestamp:
    4:17am

    Libyan ambassador, Ibrahim Dabasshi: "It is difficult to tell how many [are dead] in Tripoli - because when someone is killed, they come and take the body - also when they are injured." Says the UNSC resolution will send a warning to senior regime figures and encourage them to abandon Gaddafi.

  • Timestamp:
    4:15am

    Libyan ambassador to the UN: "I am a career diplomat ... I am not nominated by Gaddafi [to speak]. My colleagues and I are siding with the people."

  • Timestamp:
    4:13am

    Libyan ambassador to UN: "We expect the people with the regime take a position and side with the Libyan people."

  • Timestamp:
    4:11am

    Ban Ki-moon: "In the following days, even more bold action may become necessary."

  • Timestamp:
    4:06am

    The UNSC resolution also includes a ban on selling weapons to the Libyan regime, Al Jazeera's Kristen Saloomey notes

  • Timestamp:
    4:04am

    Those slapped with a travel ban: Liaison office head Dr Abdulqader Mohammed al-Baghdadi, Gaddafi's bodyguard chief Abdulqader Yusef Dibri, extrenal intelligence agency boss Abu Zayd Umar Dorda, defence minister Major General Abu Bakr Yunis Jabir, Utilities secretary Matuq Mohammed Matuq, alleged hit squad chief Sayyid Mohammed Qadhaf Al-dam, Gaddafi's daughter Aisha, sons Hannibal Muammar, Khamis Muammar, Mohammed Muammar, Mutassim, Saadi, Saif al-Arab and Saif al-Islam. Also military intelligence director Col Abdullah al-Senussi - and Gaddafi himself.

  • Timestamp:
    3:55am

    Here's a photo of that vote...

  • Timestamp:
    3:17am

    US ambassador to the UN, Susan Rice: "When atrocities are committed against innocents, the international community must act with one voice - and tonight it has."

  • Timestamp:
    3:11pm

    All 15 members vote for SC resolution 1970, a unanimous decision.

    Gaddafi family members will have their assets frozen, and which administration members will be prevented from leaving Libya.

    Asset freeze: Aisha, Hannibal, Khamis Muammar, Muammar Mohammed Abu Minyar, Mutassim and Saif al-Islam Gaddafi.

  • Timestamp:
    3:05am

    All 15 UN Security Council members are reportedly "on board" to pass a resolution referring Libyan officials to the International Criminal Court, says Kristen Saloomey, Al Jazeera's correspondent at the United Nations headquarters in New York.

    It is the first time the council has referred a country's leadership to the ICC, she says. Vote expected very soon - we're watching the diplomats settling into their chairs now.

  • Timestamp:
    2:38am

    Al Jazeera understands the UN Security Council resolution will freeze the assets of six members of the Gaddafi family, including the Libyan leader - while 16 members of his administration will be slapped with a travel ban. Waiting on news of the vote... But you can watch all the details as they unfold on our TV stream - live - by clicking here: Watch Al Jazeera now.

  • Timestamp:
    2:18pm

    As many as 50 civilians and many more severely wounded in an attack by Gaddafi loyalists in the oil refining town of Zawiyah, 50km west of Tripoli, a resident named Ibrahim told Reuters.

  • Timestamp:
    1:33am

    An Al Jazeera correspondent who has made it to Benghazi tells us the city's court house has become "press/uprising central", with a media centre, printing press, newspaper, medical clinics and satellite internet.

    File 10751

    File 10771

  • Timestamp:
    1:25am

    Henry Schuler, former US diplomat, tells Al Jazeera that the Obama administration "inherited a terrible situation created by the Bush administration in letting Gaddafi off the hook in 2004".

    "Time will tell whether that was accomplished based on a clear assessment of US interests, or to get the oil companies back into Libya, or to promote the re-election campaign of George W Bush.

    "It's a fool's errand if anyone thinks sanctions will persuade Gaddafi to back off. He said he will shed his last drop of blood on Libyan soil. What the US should be doing is ensuring that as little as possible other Libyan blood is shed."

  • Timestamp:
    1:00am

    The World Food Programme says the food supply chain in Libya "is at risk of collapsing". The Red Cross has also launched an appeal for more than US$6million for medical assistance.

  • Timestamp:
    12:42am

    The Libyan ambassador to the US has announced his support for the interim government formed in Benghazi, Reuters reports.

  • Timestamp:
    12:11am
    We're hearing that the UN Security Council is due to vote on a draft resolution - including an arms embargo on Libya, as well as a travel ban and "asset freeze" of "targeted individuals" - at around 1:00am GMT, that's in about three hours.

    The draft also authorises UN members to "take all measures to enable the return of humanitarian assistance to Libya".

  • Timestamp:
    12:02am

    We have received this statement from a group named "The Network of Free Ulema - Libya", which purports to be a collection of Muslim religious scholars and intellectuals, calling for humanitarian aid - but rejecting international military action.

    File 10731

UN slaps sanctions on Libyan regime


Security Council unanimously orders travel and assets ban on Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi and his inner circle.
Last Modified: 27 Feb 2011 01:24 GMT

The council demanded a Libya take 'steps to address the legitimate demands of the population' [Reuters]

The UN Security Council has unanimously imposed travel bans and asset freezes on Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, members of his family and inner circle.

Saturday's resolution adopted by the 15-nation council also called for the immediate referral of the deadly crackdown against anti-government demonstrators in Libya to the International Criminal Court in The Hague for investigation and possible prosecution of anyone responsible for killing civilians.

The council demanded an "immediate end to the violence and for steps to address the legitimate demands of the population" in Libya.

It called for Libyan authorities to act "with restraint, respect human rights and international humanitarian law," and facilitate immediate access for international human rights monitors.

The council called for an immediate lifting of restrictions "on all forms of media" and for the safety of foreign nationals to be assured and their departure facilitated.

Under the arms embargo, UN members will take immediate and necessary measures to "prevent the direct or indirect supply, sale or transfer to Libya ... of arms and related material of all types, including weapons and ammunition, military vehicles and equipment".

Libya would be prohibited from importing all arms and related material and all UN members should prevent their nationals from exporting them.

The travel ban and assets will target the 68-year-old Libyan leader, his adult children, other family members and top defence and intelligence officials accused of playing a role in the bloodshed.

'Moral support'

Sixteen names are on the sanctions list.

The council said its actions were aimed at "deploring the gross and systematic violation of human rights, including the repression of peaceful demonstrators".

And members expressed concern about civilian deaths, "rejecting unequivocally the incitement to hostility and violence against the civilian population made from the highest level of the Libyan government".

The day was consumed mainly with haggling behind closed doors over language that would refer Libya's violent crackdown on protesters to the International Criminal Court, or ICC, at the Hague.

All 15 nations on the council ultimately approved referring the case to the permanent war crimes tribunal.

Council members did not consider imposing a no-fly zone over Libya, and no UN-sanctioned military action was planned.

The Libyan deputy UN envoy described the adoption of sanctions as "moral support" to those resisting Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi.

Ibrahim Dabbashi, one of the first Libyan diplomats to denounce Gaddafi and defect, said the council's move "will help put an end to this fascist regime which is still in existence in Tripoli".


Source:
Agencies

Saturday, 26 February 2011

Protesters say Egypt military uses force on them


Sat, 26/02/2011 - 03:53

Egyptian soldiers fired in the air and used batons in the early hours of Saturday to disperse activists demanding the cabinet appointed by Hosni Mubarak be purged by the country's new military leaders, protesters said.

Thousands had gathered in Cairo's Tahrir Square to celebrate two weeks since Mubarak's removal and remind the country's new rulers, who have promised to guard against "counter revolution" of the people's power.

In the gathering in the epicenter of the uprising against the president, activists urged the military, who had promised there would be "no return to the past" of the Mubarak era, to overhaul the cabinet and install a team of technocrats.

But after midnight, protesters said the military fired in the air, shut off the light from lampposts, and moved in on protesters to force them to leave the square.

"Military police used batons and tasers to hit the protesters," Ahmed Bahgat, one of the protesters, told Reuters by telephone. "The military is once again using force. But the protesters have not responded."

Protesters left the main centre but many had gathered in surrounding streets, another protester, Mohamed Emad, said. Witnesses said they saw several protesters fall to the ground but it was not clear if they were wounded or how seriously.

"I am one of thousands of people who stood their ground after the army started dispersing the protesters, shooting live bullets into the air to scare them," said protester Ashraf Omar.

"They were using tasers and sticks to beat us without any control. I thought things would change. I wanted to give the government a chance but there is no hope with this regime," Omar said. "There is no use."

"I am back on the street. I either live with dignity or I die here."

A human rights watchdog said six protesters were arrested, including a member in the Coalition of Youth Revolutionaries, a loose umbrella of five youth groups who called for the 25 January Revolution.

Protesters say they want the resignation of the government of Prime Minister Ahmed Shafiq, the immediate release of political prisoners and the issuing of a general amnesty.