Friday, 13 July 2012

Austerity Reaches the Hollande Government in France


PARIS — With his first Bastille Day approaching on Saturday, François Hollande and his government have had a good start to his presidency, impressing the French with a down-to-earth style. Mr. Hollande, a Socialist, and his prime minister, Jean-Marc Ayrault, have ordered downgrades in official luxury that have set a tone self-consciously different from that of the supposedly “bling bling” presidency of Nicolas Sarkozy.
Pool photo by Kenzo Tribouillard
François Hollande has given up the presidential Citroën C6 for a smaller Citroën DS5 diesel hybrid and reduced the ranks of his official drivers.

In politics, symbols are also substance, and the changes range from the large to the small. Mr. Hollande has actually taken the train to Brussels, without a state jet following him, and his ministers have been ordered to hit the rails when possible (with a free pass on the national railway system). When they fly, they are encouraged to travel in coach class on commercial airlines. (Upgrades on Air France are probably a given for ministers, in any case.)
Official cars have been diminished in size and in luxury. Mr. Hollande has given up the presidential Citroën C6 for a smaller but hardly shabby Citroën DS5 diesel hybrid. He has reduced the ranks of his official drivers to two from three, and they are now supposed to stop at red lights. Mr. Ayrault gave up his C6 for a cheaper Peugeot 508. Cabinet ministers have also traded down, and the housing minister, Cécile Duflot, an ecologist who was criticized for wearing jeans to an Élysée Palace meeting, has ordered four official bicycles.
Champagne at receptions has largely been replaced by Muscadet, a considerably cheaper white wine, and prices at the official cafeterias for ministerial employees, always a bargain, have been raised modestly.
Even security has been put to the knife, at least a little. Junior ministers no longer get bodyguards, and the number of security workers attached to the presidency has been reduced by a third.
In general, Mr. Ayrault has ordered his ministers to reduce their official budgets sharply, by 7 percent in 2013 and by an additional 4 percent in each of the next two years.
As he promised during the campaign, Mr. Hollande has cut ministerial salaries by 30 percent (including his own, to $18,000 a month from $26,000). And for the first time, the salaries of ministers cannot exceed the prime minister’s salary, which is about $16,000 a month. Pierre Moscovici, the finance minister, told L’Express that “my salary is lower than that of my chief of staff, 12,000 euros, and of a few hundred of the civil servants” at the ministry. That is about $14,600 a month.
There has, of course, been criticism, especially from the center-right and from business leaders. Valérie Pécresse, the budget minister in Mr. Sarkozy’s government, has ridiculed these efforts as nearly meaningless in the face of France’s budget crisis, with total debt nearly 90 percent of gross domestic product and debt service alone costing more than $60 billion a year. “The austerity of the left is hypocritical,” she said. “Who will believe that the budget can be balanced by doubling the annual direct wealth tax and by lowering the salaries of ministers?”
But the symbolism is also meant to prepare the French for tougher times ahead, for some sacrifices to their own way of life and to the social-welfare system in the face of high deficits and demographic change.
Even more startling is the government’s intention to limit the remuneration of the bosses of major state-owned companies, to about 20 times that of the lowest-paid employee, or about $550,000 a year — part of an effort to end what Mr. Moscovici has called “intolerable hyperinequalities.” Henri Proglio, the chief executive of Électricité de France, reportedly earns $1.9 million a year — 64 times that of the company’s lowest-paid employee — and he could be paid about a third of what he gets now if the law goes through.
Luc Oursel, who recently took over the nuclear power company Areva, could see his salary halved to $400,000 from about $825,000. Jean-Paul Bailly, the chief of La Poste, could lose 41 percent of his $775,000 salary.
Given that French executives of state-owned companies already make less money than many of their European counterparts, there is concern that the restrictions, while essentially ideological and of little consequence for the economy, would mean that companies vital to the nation would attract fewer qualified managers. That atmosphere is enhanced by Mr. Hollande’s plans to tax those making more than $1.25 million a year at 75 percent, which, together with the revived wealth tax, could mean an effective tax rate of 90 percent.
Elvire Camus contributed reporting.

The Chatty Cathys of the Prehistoric World

‘Ice Age: Continental Drift,’ With Ray Romano

Blue Sky Studios/20th Century Fox
Scrat, voiced by Chris Wedge, in "Ice Age: Continental Drift."
Fans of 20th Century Fox animation, you have cause to rejoice. A charming 3-D cartoon arrives in theaters on Friday, witty and touching and marvelously concise, part of a series that has managed to stay fresh and inventive after many years in the pop-culture spotlight.

There is one catch, though. If you want to see this little picture — a four-and-a-half-minute dialogue-free delight called “The Longest Daycare,” in which Maggie Simpson stands up for what’s right at a preschool named after Ayn Rand — you must also buy a ticket to “Ice Age: Continental Drift.”
The Simpsons short cleverly blends the bright-colored flatness of the television show with the gimmickry of 3-D. It also upholds (more than the TV series itself) one of the golden rules of animation: no talking. With the important exception of Scrat — the obsessive rodent whose Sisyphean pursuit of an acorn is one of the great love stories of our time — the “Ice Age” movies go in the opposite direction. They come close to inspiring a new theory of prehistoric extinction: All those species clearly died from the hot air that gathered in the atmosphere as a result of their inability to shut up for even a minute.
The principle guiding the “Ice Age” franchise seems to be that you can’t have too many celebrity voice-overs. This is not entirely unpleasant. During the “Continental Drift” end credits (if you can endure a dreadful song about how we’re all one big happy family), you can match various animals with their human impersonators.
Drake and Nicki Minaj are mammoths, part of a cool-kid pack that supplies this plot-stuffed adventure with its teen-movie subplot. Wanda Sykes — no mistaking her voice — is the elderly sloth who provides genuine comic relief amid a lot of forced jollity. And that villainous pirate primate whose diction you spent nearly 90 minutes trying to identify (or maybe that was just me)? Peter Dinklage! Six-year-old “Game of Thrones” fans will be giddy with joy.
You want more? Aziz Ansari! Joy Behar! Patrick Stewart! Also John Leguizamo, of course, returning as the sloth equivalent of Eddie Murphy’s “Shrek” Donkey.
As you may have gathered, there is a lot going on here. Visually, there is quite a bit of slipping and sliding and falling and careening in a landscape of jagged rocks, spiky ice floes and state-of-the-art computer-generated water.
The Blue Sky animation studio’s house style is enjoyably antic, with a playful but never sloppy disregard for the laws of physics. An early sequence in which Scrat accidentally causes the breakup of the earth’s single landmass sets a high mark for cleverness that the rest of the film sometimes tries to match. Among the busy, chaotic set pieces, a few stand out, notably a haunting and absurd encounter with shape-shifting sirens who lure mariners to their doom.
Mariners? In the Pleistocene era? The problem is not that “Continental Drift,” directed by Steve Martino and Michael Thurmeier from a screenplay by Michael Berg and Jason Fuchs, takes liberties with the scientific record. (The movie makes fun of a previous episode’s use of dinosaurs, which never coexisted with mammoths.) The problem is that its sense of fun is essentially parasitic. Those pirates, those cool kids, that mass of cute, squeaky, nonverbal creatures (hamsters? chipmunks?) — all of them try to entertain you by reminding you of things you’ve seen before.
And the stories — again, with the heroic and necessary exception of Scrat, a character with whom I identify perhaps more than is healthy — are warmed-over hash. Manny (Ray Romano) and Ellie (Queen Latifah) must deal with the adolescence of their daughter, Peaches (Keke Palmer), who must learn a lesson about true friendship and being yourself. Diego the saber-toothed tiger (Denis Leary) falls into a love-hate romance with a feisty female named Shira (Jennifer Lopez). Also, Manny must rescue his family from disaster and fight off bad guys.
It may be too much to expect novelty — then again, why shouldn’t we? — but a little more conviction might be nice. “Continental Drift,” like its predecessors, is much too friendly to dislike, and its vision of interspecies multiculturalism is generous and appealing.
But it is not my impression that the “Ice Age” movies have inspired the kind of devoted affection that clings to some other recent animated entertainment. Which may make it a bit cruel of Fox to lead with that instantly, durably lovable Simpsons short.
“Ice Age: Continental Drift” is rated PG (Parental guidance suggested). Danger and fighting.
Ice Age
Continental Drift
Opens on Friday nationwide.
Directed by Steve Martino and Michael Thurmeier; written by Michael Berg and Jason Fuchs, based on a story by Mr. Berg and Lori Forte; music by John Powell; produced by Ms. Forte and John C. Donkin; released by 20th Century Fox. Running time: 1 hour 27 minutes.
WITH THE VOICES OF: Ray Romano (Manny), John Leguizamo (Sid), Denis Leary (Diego), Jennifer Lopez (Shira), Queen Latifah (Ellie), Seann William Scott (Crash), Josh Peck (Eddie), Nicki Minaj (Steffie), Drake (Ethan), Peter Dinklage (Captain Gutt), Aziz Ansari (Squint), Joy Behar (Eunice), Patrick Stewart (Ariscratle), Wanda Sykes (Granny), Keke Palmer (Peaches) and Kunal Nayyar (Gupta).

In Simply Meeting, Egyptian and Saudi Leaders Open New Era

CAIRO — In his first foreign visit as Egypt’s newly elected president, Mohamed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood met Thursday with King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, a signal that the two intended to set aside their profound ideological enmity in favor of pragmatic mutual interests.
Egyptian Presidency, via European Pressphoto Agency
Mohamed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood met Thursday with King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia.
It was a meeting freighted with symbolism. The Saudi Arabian monarchy is the conservative anchor at the center of the authoritarian order that prevailed across the Middle East. It was a close ally of the former Egyptian strongman Hosni Mubarak, and in both Washington and Cairo, Saudi envoys pushed hard to rally support for his government and then to protect him from trial, Western and Egyptian diplomats say.
Mr. Morsi owes his election to the popular uprising that finally cracked the old order, which the Brotherhood struggled for decades to overturn. The Islamist movement has long opposed the Saudi monarchy as a decadent, hypocritical and undemocratic tool of Western interests in the region. Though founded in Egypt, the Brotherhood has a sizable underground franchise in Saudi Arabia, despite a legal ban on its existence and deep animosity from the kingdom’s rulers.
But Egypt desperately needs Saudi Arabian financial support to weather an economic crisis brought on by its 18 months of turmoil. In May, Saudi Arabia reportedly deposited $1 billion in Egypt’s central bank to help the country stay afloat until it can work out a proposed $3.2 billion loan package from the International Monetary Fund, and it has pledged still more. Egypt is believed to need about $9 billion to avoid an economic calamity.
Saudi Arabia also employs hundreds of thousands of Egyptians — including one of Mr. Morsi’s sons, a urologist — whose remittances home are a major support for the Egyptian economy.
Various points of friction complicate the relationship. At the moment, Saudi Arabia is holding in jail an Egyptian lawyer, Ahmed el-Gizawi, whose detention has become a major cause here. He was arrested three months ago on charges of smuggling antidepressants in Saudi Arabia, but he had come to the attention of the authorities because he filed a lawsuit demanding that the kingdom release other Egyptians held without charges.
Mr. Gizawi’s arrest set off protests outside Saudi consulates here, which prompted the brief recall of the Saudi ambassador. Securing Mr. Gizawi’s release would be a major boost to Mr. Morsi’s popularity.
For its part, Saudi Arabia needs Egypt, the most populous Arab state and home to the most formidable Arab army. Both countries are anxious to counter Iranian influence in the region, and the Saudi-dominated Gulf Cooperation Council has even floated the idea of enlisting Egypt as some sort of auxiliary member to help firm up its military alliance.
What is more, the Saudi monarchy may fear that the Islamists in Cairo could potentially exercise a subversive influence in support of Brotherhood allies inside Saudi Arabia.
But Mr. Morsi made clear in his inaugural address that he shared Saudi Arabia’s opposition to the situation in Syria, where the Iranian-backed government of Bashar al-Assad has been crushing his opponents in what is nearing civil war.
Rayed Krimly, an official with the Saudi Arabian Foreign Ministry, said Mr. Morsi had made clear “that he doesn’t interfere in the internal politics of another country.” Mr. Morsi had made the same point in his inaugural address, reassuring neighbors that Egypt had no intention to export revolution.
As for Mr. Morsi’s history with the Brotherhood, Mr. Krimly said, “We deal with Egypt as a state and with the institutions of Egypt, not its internal politics, so it doesn’t affect us.”
Mr. Krimly said there had been “attempts by other countries” to raise tensions in the relationship. He might have been referring to bogus reports recently circulated by a semiofficial Iranian news agency that Mr. Morsi or others in Egypt sought close ties to Iran. Such a development would unnerve both Saudi Arabia and Israel.
But Mr. Krimly said the meeting reinforced “the strong and solid relationship” between Egypt and Saudi Arabia, as well as “the importance of each country to the other one.”
He said that Saudi Arabia was now Egypt’s most important source of critical financial support. “And we will continue to support Egypt,” he said. “Egypt is important.”

Ronaldinho Loses $750,000 Coke Deal For Drinking Pepsi!

July 12, 2012
By
Ronaldinho
Uh.. so sad for the superstar:
All soccer superstar Ronaldinho wanted to do was quench his thirst when he sipped from a can of Pepsi during a press conference. But that seemingly innocuous gesture revived a longstanding feud between soft drink giants Coco Cola and Pepsi.
According to The Atlanta Journal Constitution, the Atlanta-based Coke reacted to Ronaldinho’s two-timing by yanking the Brazilian star’s lucrative $750,000 sponsorship. That’ll teach him to be faithful.
“The fact that the player has appeared with a can of Pepsi was the straw that broke the camel’s back,” Coca-Cola marketing chief Marcelo Pontes told the newspaper. “The sponsorship had become embarrassing.”
The press conference was held to promote his new team, Atletico Mineiro, of which Pepsi is a sponsor. Coke’s $750,000 sponsorship deal with Ronaldinho was scheduled to run through 2014.

Olympic military security ranks swell further in London

A view of the inside of London's new Olympic Stadium, a major venue at the Games

Olympics

The British government has put a further 3,500 military personnel on standby for the 2012 Olympics, bringing the total to around 17,000. A security contractor's inability to deliver what it promised prompted the move.
Home Secretary Theresa May came under fire in parliament on Thursday after announcing that another 3,500 troops would be put on standby to make sure that security services were equipped for the Olympic Games. Roughly 13,500 military personnel had already been mobilized.
"I can confirm to the House that there remains no specific security threat to the Games and the threat level remains unchanged," May said. "And let me reiterate that there is no question of Olympic security being compromised."
A private security contractor, G4S, had been hired to provide in excess of 10,000 security guards for the Games, but it issued a statement calling the Olympic deployment "unprecedented and very complex" and saying it had encountered delays when processing applicants. May told parliamentarians in Westminster that the "absolute gap in numbers was only crystallized" one day earlier.
An opposition Labour party MP with internal security responsibilities, Keith Vaz, was highly critical of May and G4S alike.
"G4S has let the country down and we have literally had to send in the troops," Vaz said, also asking whether the group would now face financial penalties for the apparent shortfall.
The Olympic opening ceremony takes place in London on July 27. The British government has been trying to provide satisfactory levels of security, especially for visiting dignitaries and potential terror targets, without spoiling the atmosphere of the event.
It is the country's largest peacetime security operation ever, with some 23,700 security staff earmarked to protect the various events. The 17,000 military personnel now on standby contrasts with the roughly 9,500 British troops currently serving in Afghanistan.
A parliamentary committee for intelligence and security affairs on Thursday submitted a report saying that the Games had put "unprecedented pressure" on the country's spy agencies. The committee said security agencies had been forced to freeze holidays and non-essential staff moves, while also increasing working hours for staff.
"All these [measures] increase capacity to deal with the greater flows of intelligence, but they have been described to us as 'having quite a significant impact' and being 'very difficult for some people'," the report said.
The Olympic Village opens its doors on Monday.
msh/sej (AFP, AP, dpa, Reuters)

Thursday, 12 July 2012

Afghans in Kabul protest woman's execution

Demonstrators march for gender rights and against shooting carried out in Parwan last week and captured in video clip.
Last Modified: 11 Jul 2012 19:27

Women activists march in Kabul with banners to protest the recent public execution of a young woman [Reuters]
Scores of men and women have taken to the streets of Kabul to protest the recent public slaying of an Afghan woman whose gruesome, execution-style killing was captured on video.
The crowd of demonstrators carried large white sheets on Wednesday that said "International community: Where is the protection and justice for Afghan women?"
They marched from the Afghan Ministry of Women's Affairs to a traffic circle near a UN compound, and some shouted: "Death to those who did this act!"
"We want the government to take action on behalf of these women ... who are victims of violence and who are being killed," said Zuhra Alamyar, a woman activist who was at the Kabul rally. "We want the government to take serious action and stop them."
The video footage, which surfaced recently, shows the woman being shot multiple times about 10 days ago in Parwan province, north of the Afghan capital.
The gunman was encouraged by people who stood nearby, smiling and cheering.
Police in Parwan said the Taliban were behind the killing, but the group have denied they ordered or carried out the slaying.
Process of reform
The death of the woman, who was said to be in her 20s, set off a storm of condemnation. President Hamid Karzai, the US embassy, the top NATO military commander in Afghanistan and activist groups all denounced the killing.
It was a reminder that girls and women still suffer shocking abuse in Afghanistan, but the protest also indicated that people's views on women's rights there could be slowly changing.
Wazhma Frogh, executive director of the Research Institute for Women, Peace and Security, told Al Jazeera that organisers counted more than 300 people at the rally, of whom at least 85 were men.
Frogh said she travelled to Parwan, where the execution took place, and saw women experiencing a renewed sense of fear.
"But this event was nothing new for us," Frogh said. "When we first saw the reports, we flashed back to the stoning of a couple in Kunduz last year and the stoning of a woman in 1998."
"The truth is though, every day we are under threat. If we stay at home we are under threat. If we go to school we are under threat."
Despite guaranteed rights and progressive new laws, the UN Development Programme still ranks Afghanistan as one of the world's worst countries when it comes to equal rights for women.
Afghan advocates say attitudes have subtly shifted over the years, in part thanks to the dozens of women's groups that have sprung up.
'Face justice'
Still, ending abuse of women is a huge challenge in a patriarchal society where traditional practices include child marriage, giving girls away to settle debts or pay for their relatives' crimes and honour killings in which girls seen as disgracing their families are murdered by relatives.
Women activists worry that gains made in recent years could erode as the international presence in Afghanistan wanes and the government seeks to negotiate a settlement with the Taliban fighters.
During the Taliban regime, women were banned from working and going to school, or even leaving home without a male relative. In public, all women were forced to wear a head-to-toe burqa veil, which covers even the face with a mesh panel.
The video surfaced just before donor nations met over the weekend in Tokyo and pledged $16bn in aid for Afghanistan.
The donors expressed strong concerns over how the money would be handled and also called on Kabul to improve human rights, especially women's rights.
"We want from the government to follow the killing of the women in Afghanistan and hand over those responsible to face justice," said Afghan activist Sima Samar from the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission.
Source:
Al Jazeera and agencies

Security personnel killed in Pakistan raid


Eight police and prison staff shot dead after gunmen storm a building in the eastern city of Lahore.
Last Modified: 12 Jul 2012 04:00

Gunmen have shot dead eight Pakistani police and prison staff, and wounded nine others after storming a building in the eastern city of Lahore where they were sleeping, police said.

Thursday's raid was the second attack in three days on security personnel in the province of Punjab, raising fears of a fresh wave of violence in the political heartland of Pakistan away from the northwest where a Taliban insurgency is based.

The attackers arrived on motorbikes and targeted a building in the densely populated area of Ichra, where up to 35 police and prison staff were living, mostly officers from the troubled northwest who were in Lahore for training.

"The gunmen came early in the morning, entered the building and opened fire," Lahore police chief Aslam Tareen told the AFP news agency. "Eight were martyred and nine others are wounded".

The gunmen fled and there was no immediate claim of responsibility.

Pakistan is battling an insurgency in its northwest tribal region, but attacks in Punjab and Lahore - the country's political heartland - have been rare in recent months.

But on Monday, gunmen shot dead seven security personnel at an army camp less than 150km southeast of Islamabad, again arriving by motorbike, opening fire and then fleeing.

One senior security official told AFP it was "highly likely" that the attackers belonged to a banned organisation in league with the Taliban.
Source:
Agencies